Pastor’s Blog, April 2007

2007: February March May June July August September October November December
2008: January February March April May June July

RESPOND

Warring for What?

Progress digitizing Faith Assembly recorded sermons: February 26, 1995 p.m.

Sunday, April 29, 2007
John 12:12

8:10 p.m.
I don’t often give you the actual verse within a chapter, because I usually stop reading at the end of a chapter. But, when I stopped at John 12:12, I realized there was something very special there. Go back to Friday, April 12, 6:25 p.m. and read that section. I believe that totally establishes that Jesus was crucified on a Thursday, and the Passover meal was on a Wednesday. Now, look at the first verse of John 12.

{John 12:1} Then Jesus six days before the passover came to Bethany, where Lazarus was which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead.

So, we can count, can’t we? Passover was on Wednesday. One day before the Passover was therefore Tuesday. 2, Monday; 3, Sunday; 4, Saturday; 5, Friday; 6, Thursday. So, it was on a Thursday that Mary anointed Jesus’ feet with precious ointment. Now, read it carefully down to verses 12–13.

{John 12:12–13} On the next day much people that were come to the feast, when they heard that Jesus was coming to Jerusalem, {13} Took branches of palm trees, and went forth to meet him, and cried, Hosanna: Blessed is the King of Israel that cometh in the name of the Lord.

The next day! The anointing was on Thursday; the Triumphal Entry had to be on Friday. These are not a matter of debate. They are absolutely fixed, based on the perfectly clear statements of specific days and numbers of days from one event to the next. I have often said that there is no way all the events attributed to “holy week” could have happened just between one Sunday and the next. But, adding two extra days definitely does suffice.
    It always amazes me when I see something like this. It was there all along, but I never noticed it before, and, it would seem no one else did either. This is not the kind of thing that scholars should even have to debate, but should be completely familiar as the facts of the case to everyone who can read the Bible and put two and two together

Today I had the difficult task of publicly saying farewell to two of my children who have decided that Faith Assembly is not the church for them. None of us knows the future, so I can say it is their present decision, without having to confess it is their permanent choice. They will still be living in the area, and they both love the Lord and mean to serve Him, but for their own reasons, they are not happy at Faith Assembly. What can we say, but “God bless you, and we pray He will watch over you wherever you go.” And, I will add to that, “I pray that He will watch over every one of us, and if we stray, He will correct us, just as firmly as required, to get us back on the path.” Gently, or severely, whatever it takes, I do not give up my children to go the way of the world, to fade into the religious systems of man, and live for the pleasures of this world, while “playing church” to appear spiritual to themselves and others. I am also trusting that, without the pressure of feeling they have to come to Faith Assembly unwillingly, maybe they will feel more at ease being part of our family otherwise. They know where we stand on various things. I pray they can respect us and not feel they have to prove anything by flaunting the differences that exist between us. This will, indeed, be a test of hearts all the way around. God bless you, Seth and Hannah.

 

Saturday, April 28, 2007
John 8

10:45 p.m.
Long day. Office 7:30 to 11:30 a.m. Then canoeing with daughters Debbie and Becky, an excursion that took from 12:30 to 3:15 p.m., till we got the canoe loaded up, drove to the place, canoed a while, drove back home, and unloaded. Then went to Fort Wayne with Sarah, Vreneli, and Abigail to get some things for Vreneli’s laptop computer and a travel ice chest with electric refrigeration, plus eat out. Back home by 7:30 p.m. or so. Worked on outline of Mark 3 for tomorrow’s teaching. Then did some puzzles, falling asleep, so what I want to do now is . . . Zzzzzzzz! Good night!

 

Thursday, April 26, 2007
John 7

9:00 p.m.
Thoughts of the moment: Read yesterday’s thought for the moment. I have had a rough couple of days. So, okay, there is a price to be paid to be a disciple of Jesus. But it is not my purpose here to say dire things about anyone, so I’ve deleted what I wrote earlier.
    In any case, I am determined that, like Paul “None of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God” (Acts 20:24). Jesus makes it crystal clear that, “No one, having put his hand to the plow, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God” (Luke 9:62). I thank God for His care over me and all my loved ones, and I am confident that He will complete His work in each one of us. Only, I know I am, and my entire family is, saved by grace, not because any of us deserve God’s favor. Thank You, Jesus!

 

Wednesday, April 25, 2007
John 5

9:00 a.m.
Thoughts of the moment: God offers one way, one kingdom, one salvation, one faith, one Answer. Man’s religious system offers choices: one God, but two kingdoms, and we can serve God’s kingdom within man’s kingdoms; or, one source, two methods of healing; or, we actually can serve God and Mammon; or, we can promote God’s Kingdom using the ways and means of man’s kingdom. I am going to preach on this tonight, God willing. You can hear the message live on Paltalk. Just click the link
{Direct link to our Paltalk Room} and follow the instructions. The room will open beginning around 7:00 p.m. eastern time. There will be worship until about 7:30, then the message.

 

Tuesday, April 24, 2007
John 4

4:00 p.m.
Well, the main thing right now is that I have been profoundly challenged by Luke 21:8, which says,

“Take heed that you not be deceived. For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am He,’ and, ‘The time has drawn near.’ Therefore do not go after them.”

That hit me like a ton of bricks, because much of my ministry has been centered on the theme of “Jesus is coming soon,” and, frankly, I cannot see the difference between that and saying, “The time has drawn near.” So, I asked God to show me what He means. Have I been totally missing His will all these years? The answer is, I am to call people to follow Jesus, not because His return is near, but because we owe Him our lives, no matter when He comes. The common theme of “Jesus is coming soon,” has been the focus of ministries as long as I can remember. As a result, people simply turn off their minds when they hear that message. It encourages a shallow, “foxhole” commitment, because people figure they can give up the pleasures of this life for a short time, being led to believe Jesus will surely come within a few short years. But, thirty years later, they feel they have been swindled, and no longer trust any minister who talks about the second coming of Christ.
    It is one thing to know that Jesus could come at any time. That is a central part of the hope of the gospel.  But, it is not supposed to be “hype” to pressure someone into making a commitment, being continually led along with virtual promises that He will come “very soon,” suggesting a time frame of only days or months, or at the most a couple of years, like the proverbial carrot on a stick held just out of reach of the reluctant donkey, to keep him taking another step forward. God doesn’t want His ministers doing that, and Jesus’ words in Luke 21:8 warn people not to follow that message. The parallel passages of Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21, are to give the true disciples of Jesus hope, to sustain them through all the things they will face in life. Make no mistake, the signs of the times are getting more and more serious. There is nothing preventing Jesus breaking in except his own longsuffering, both toward the lost and toward the elect, that He is not willing that any should perish.
    So, our message is not to be the “hype” of  “Jesus is coming soon! Quick! Repent, so you don’t miss the rapture!” but, “Repent for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.” Jesus could come at any time. We don’t know when. But, now is the day of salvation, because our life is but a vapor. None of us knows the length of his own life on this earth, but the Bible is clear that we must surrender to Christ in this life to be with Him in the next. What did Jesus preach? “Repent for I am coming soon”? No, it was “Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.” Repentance is for our lives here and now, as long as we live. It is a life commitment, not just a short term sacrifice to get into the rapture.
    We need to remember, life is lived one moment at a time; one step at a time. Every step we take is the first step of the rest of our life. It is of utmost importance that we make the right decisions for each step we take.

 

Sunday, April 22, 2007
John 1

5:00 p.m.
Just a quick note to say I had plenty to do yesterday, so I didn’t get around to entering a blog, and I really don’t have time to do a major entry now.

 

Friday, April 20, 2007
Luke 22; later, Luke 24

7:35 a.m.
I didn’t have time to blog yesterday because my wife, Rene, and I traveled to Dearborn, Michigan, to spend the afternoon with her parents. We left around 9:00 a.m. and got back after 9:00 p.m. I read Luke 22 in the morning before we left.
    My wife’s parents were missionaries to the Yagua Indians in Peru for half a century, and her father is continuing to work on making the scriptures accessible in their native language. He has been working on preparing digitized recordings of the New Testament to be placed into small, solid state devices that are solar powered and fully sealed, and so it is hoped will be almost totally maintenance free, and impervious to the moisture and molds that plague typical electronic devices in tropical climates. He needed help converting *.CDA files (the format of any audio CD) into a file format he can modify as needed, and eventually save in MP3 format. I was able to help him get over a couple of hurdles so he can now continue his project.
    After I have time to read some more, plus get some orders filled for Faith Ministries, I will continue this entry.

6:25 p.m.
I have now finished Luke. I discovered a verse that further proves the crucifixion must have occurred on Thursday: Luke 24:21, where the disciples on the road to Emmaus, on the first day of the week, say, “This is now the third day since these things happened.” Third day since? Okay, second day since would be Saturday, the Sabbath; first day since would be Friday; so, the day it happened had to be Thursday. And the Last Supper, which was the Passover meal, was Wednesday evening after sundown, by our current reckoning. If we accept the Bible as the infallible Word breathed out by God, there’s just no option to make up our own chronology here. And, there is no way you can make it exactly 72 hours, because Jesus died at the ninth hour, which is 3:00 in the afternoon, and rose on the first day of the week before dawn. I don’t care if you take the first day of the week clear back to right after sundown at the end of the Sabbath (which not even the Jews did, if you go by the way the gospels say “it began to dawn toward the first day of the week” — they may have begun ritual observances at sundown, but they still had the day itself as the first day, second say, and so on); I don’t care if you have Jesus crucified on Wednesday (which, if He was crucified on Wednesday, then the disciples on the first day of the week would be into the fourth day since, not the third day since); it still could not be 72 hours exactly. He would have to rise at 3:00 in the afternoon for it to be 72 hours exactly. If you want to make up a doctrine that He arose secretly at 3:00 in the afternoon on the Sabbath, then you will have to explain why the disciples celebrated the resurrection on the first day of the week forever after that. No, it is as I have taught it: He was dead during daylight hours of Thursday, Friday, and Saturday; and during the nighttime hours between Thursday and Friday; between Friday and Saturday; and between Saturday and Sunday; rising before dawn on Sunday. That, again, has the crucifixion on Thursday, and the Last Supper on Wednesday.
    Well, time for prayer meeting.

 

Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Luke 21

1:05 p.m.
    As you can see, I am changing the format a bit here. So I can have more than one entry without repeating the large sized heading, I am putting the time of the blog at the beginning of the text. Also, notice that I am adding a line above the blog to give the progress on the project of digitizing Faith Assembly recorded sermons. I need to get on with preparing for tonight’s teaching, so this will be all for now.

 

Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Luke 17; later, Luke 19

6:50 a.m.
    Before I do anything else today, I want you to know I did read yesterday and finished through Luke 17. Instead of blogging, I went on a spring wildflower walk in the woods with my oldest daughter, Sarah. I will blog more later. God bless.

7:45 p.m.
    I had a productive day. I finished through number 178 digitizing the Radio Broadcast messages of Brother Freeman. Did the usual filling of orders for Faith Ministries. Some of the Radio Broadcast messages reminded me that the things I am teaching have not come to me totally without human instrumentality. Here are a couple of examples of things that I have taught that I heard on Radio Broadcast messages today:

1. The nine gifts of the Spirit in I Corinthians 12, and six additional in Romans 12, are not to be taken as the only ones God has given, but as examples.
2. Word of Knowledge is past and present facts, while Word of Wisdom is revelation of God’s plans and purposes not yet fulfilled in the temporal realm.
3. Word of Wisdom is not just human insight into the solution of a problem, but it includes supernatural revelations of answers beyond human wisdom.

This just reassures me of the advantage of having received the message by listening to the tapes, over having heard Brother Freeman live, mixed in with a lot of other ministers, who may or may not have understood or taught the message clearly, and one could easily have confused issues, as to who taught what, and did something another minister said from the Faith Assembly pulpit have Brother Freeman’s agreement, just because he allowed him to preach? Listening to tapes, there was no chance of any confusion about who said what. It doesn’t make me any better than anyone else; but it comforts me to hear confirmation of the things I have taught and am teaching.
    That will be all for today. God bless.

 

Sunday, April 15, 2007, 4:50 p.m. EDST
Luke 14

I don't have time to blog just now, but there is my progress in reading. God bless.

 

Saturday, April 14, 2007, 9:30 a.m. EDST
Luke 10

My main projects this morning will be preparing for the next study in Mark for tomorrow morning, and more digitizing as time permits. If I have something to blog about later, I’ll be back.

 

Thursday, April 12, 2007, 2:45 p.m. EDST
Luke 8

Right now I am working on the project of digitizing my own tapes. I have digitized two, and finalized the first of those two. I will work on finalizing the second while a third is digitizing.
    Meanwhile, I discovered after making reservations for vacation that I had begun with the wrong start date. I managed to get two of the reservations corrected, but haven’t yet been able to get through on the third. I doubt there will be a problem, but it is always comforting to know it is settled.
    So, having nothing presently on my mind to blog about, I will continue with my digitizing project.

 

Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 3:10 p.m. EDST
Luke 6

Praise the Lord. I have made all the reservations necessary for our family vacation. Persistence was required, but rewarded in the end. I will disclose more of our provisional plans in the days ahead. All is subject to the Lord’s leading day by day, of course, and we must not focus our attention so much on a trip two months away that we neglect our duties here and now. We are witnesses, wherever we go; today, as well as on vacation.
    And now, it is time to focus on preparation for this evening’s teaching.

 

Monday, April 9, 2007, 6:10 p.m. EDST
Luke 4

Well, you will just have to bear with me, I can’t promise to blog every day. Saturday and Sunday were busy enough without trying to work in time to write an entry here. As you can see, I am through Luke 4 now. I read Luke 1 on Saturday, and Luke 2–4 today. My reading on Sunday was in Mark 2, preparing for the morning message, and Genesis 26, preparing for the evening message.
    I have some things I need to do, and I don’t have anything pressing on my mind to say right now, so this will probably by my blog for the day. God bless.

 

Friday, April 6, 2007, 6:20 p.m. EDST
Mark 16

Eh, what? I didn't blog yesterday? I didn't at least sign in enough to say I was through Mark 13? Well, I was, and I finished Mark today. Oh, I remember. I was going to blog in the evening, but instead, I did two fatherly things. First, I cut out some parts for the hope chest project I am working on with my daughter Abigail (junior in high school). Second, I drove my car to my second son Seth’s house in Fort Wayne, because his car acted up on him and he had to have it towed, and so he couldn’t run an errand he had planned to run for his sister Vreneli, and so I drove my car, and Vreneli drove her car to bring me back home in, and when we got there, Seth got in my car and I drove Vreneli’s car and Seth led the way from his house to where the errand had to be run (because he knows his way through Fort Wayne), so we would get to the store before it closed. We made it with ten minutes to spare. By the time we got back home, blogging was not on my mind.
    Well, I must say, I am still concerned about my life and the life of most Christians in this country. I question whether it is even possible for us to conceive of taking seriously what Jesus required of His disciples. I never hear anyone wondering how we so easily get out of the requirements He gave the rich young ruler. The twelve who followed Jesus didn’t protest, “But, Jesus, that isn’t fair! You have not required us to forsake all to follow you.” No, but one of them did say, basically, “Lord, we have forsaken all. What will we get out of it?”

{Mark 10:28–30} Then Peter began to say unto him, Lo, we have left all, and have followed thee. 29 And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's, 30 But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life.

Go figure! People today take that to mean that we don’t have to forsake all! I am sorry, but something doesn’t add up; at least it doesn’t add up to me. They say, “Well, we have to forsake it in our hearts.” Fine. What does that mean? What will the result be, if we truly forsake it in our hearts? Again, I am sorry, but I think if people were forsaking their lives in this world “in their hearts,” it would make a more obvious difference in how they manage and use their material possessions. I am including myself. I am no conspicuous big spender on myself or my family, but I am not satisfied that my priorities are totally as they should be, either. I say that, knowing that if the standard were “tithing,” that is, giving a measly ten percent of my gross income to the Lord’s work, I am way ahead of the game! But tithing is not a New Testament principle. We are called to the higher standard that everything we have belongs to God, and we are merely stewards.
    Prayer meeting time. God bless.

 

Wednesday, April 4, 2007, 3:25 p.m. EDST
Mark 10

Just slipping in long enough to update so April is a separate document from March, and so February, March, and April are all hyperlinked together, and so the home page link goes to this document.
    Another thing I have noticed in Mark is that he goes into more detail concerning healings and deliverances from demons. Putting fingers in ears, physically touching eyes, spitting and touching the tongue, talking to people while ministering, and so on: more of the process taking place in the healings. Maybe there is some of that in other Gospels, but Mark seems to do it more. Also, he seems to give more place names, and names of individuals (not just Levi, but Levi, the son of Alphaeus; not just Bartimaeus, but Bartimaeus, the son of Timaeus; also, Boanerges, nickname for James and John, sons of Zebedee).
    Well, I will come back and write more later as time permits.

 

Tuesday, April 3, 2007, 9:00 p.m. EDST
Mark 8

It is quite interesting to notice the unique characteristics of each of the four gospels, particularly the three synoptics, Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Most of the familiar stories of the life of Christ are recorded in more than one gospel, but different gospels may record different details. One example is the account of the great faith of the Syrophoenician woman: her nationality is recorded only in the gospel of Mark. The rest of the details, such as the disciples asking Jesus to send her away, are from Matthew. Luke does not record the incident at all.
    Such details are used by theologians and scholars to try to establish the different purposes for the various gospels, although such endeavors are somewhat speculative, at best, in my humble estimation. The problem is, once they think they have an idea why Mark wrote his gospel, or why Luke wrote his, then they start to interpret selectively or diversely, depending on which gospel it is.
    There is a popular idea among scholars that no one can understand the gospels — indeed, the Bible in its entirety — unless they have an in-depth knowledge of the culture and customs of the day when the accounts were written. That means, if they are right, most people really are wasting their time to study the Bible. While agree that there is a place for teachers who can spend more time in study to bring out some of these details, the fact is, our knowledge of those times is sketchy at best, and even those who devote their lives to studying the subject come to different conclusions and disagree among themselves.
    No, our understanding of God’s Word does not depend as much on scholarship as on knowing God, and having the Holy Spirit with us to guide us into all truth. The faith of the Syrophoenician woman was great — and would have been just as great if she had been Roman or Babylonian, or even Jewish! The significance of her nationality was that she, a Gentile, asked Jesus, the Messiah of the Jews, to heal her daughter, and how Jesus and the disciples responded.
    Anyway, reading through Mark, it almost seemed like a “strange” book. I noticed the details missing from certain stories we know better from Matthew or Luke — or even the details included that we just assume must be in another gospel from which we perhaps recall most of the account. Something else I noticed in Mark: in the call of Matthew, he is identified as “Levi, son of Alphaeus.” But when Mark lists the names of the disciples, the son of Alphaeus is James, and Matthew is another disciple. I believe it is clear enough in the various references that Matthew is the same as Levi; so, then, are Matthew/Levi and James brothers, sons of the same father? I would have to assume so. In any case, that is the position I take in my own teachings. Mark also records the nickname “Boanerges,” or “sons of thunder,” by which James and John, sons of Zebedee were evidently known.
    Probably the most remarkable thing I have found in Mark’s gospel is his frequent use of one particular term. It is the Greek word eutheos (transliteration, roughly pronounced “yew-THEH-ose”), usually translated “immediately.” This word occurs 78 times in the entire New Testament, but of those, 40 occurrences are in Mark’s gospel. And, I just do not believe Mark was saying “immediately” this and “immediately” that all the time. The word is a connective word for narration, and should often (probably most of the time in Mark’s gospel) be translated, “next thing,” “after this,” “afterward,” or “consequently,” depending on the context.
    Well, anyway... I guess I’ll call it a blog, and get off of here for now. God bless.

 

Monday, April 2, 2007, 7:30 p.m. EDST
Mark 7

Hmm.... I really don’t have anything in the front of my mind pressing to be said. What I think I really should do is go out and work on some repair projects in the shop. There just are times I need to do things under the category of husband and father, rather than pastor. If anything important comes to mind, I might write more later.

 

Sunday, April 1, 2007, 6:15 p.m. EDST
Mark 3

Consider the update of “Warring for What?” as my entry for the present time.